Archives for category: On copy editing

Use vs. Utilized

I do a fair amount of academic and technology editing and one word I am constantly booting off the page is “utilized.”

If you mean “use,” you should feel comfortable using “use.” It’s a marvelous and compact three-letter word that conveys a common concept without hogging character space. It may be one of the greatest words in the English language when you consider its small, unassuming stature compared to its many appropriate applications.

When I see the word “utilize” in any writing, I hear alarm bells. It suggests the author may be trying to sound important, extend the word count, perhaps is grasping for a synonym to shake up her writing or has spent too much time in the science lab.

According to one of my favorite sites, Grammar Girl, “utilize” does have a scientific function. If you are discussing chemical reactions and absorptions, you are correct to choose the longer, specific form.

If you are not submitting to a scientific journal, I suggest you stick with “use.” And consider the glorious history of our 3-lettered friend, as provided by Google:

UseetymologyBLOG

per·snick·et·y

[per-snik-i-tee]  adjective
1. excessively precise and attentive to detail; fussy
2. (of a task) requiring close attention; exacting

I embrace my own word nerdery; I revel in the history and origin of words. I love the feel of certain words in my mouth and even just rolling around in my brain.

Persnickety is one of my favorites. It has several things going for it: onomatopoeia, flowing syllables and a warm, diminutive ending with “y.”

It has an original negative connotation that has been taken up by persnickety folks such as myself and transformed into a positive. When it comes to editing, being excessively precise and attentive to detail isn’t fussy – it is ideal. I approach every editing job with a persnickety attitude and it never fails to serve my clients well.

%d bloggers like this: